Archive for January, 2008

New Podcast: Dr. Meena Bose, Lib. ‘90

This week I had the great pleasure of interviewing this year’s Mark Luchinsky Lecturer. Dr. Bose is a Scholar alumna and also a scholar of presidential studies, so we had a great time talking about this year’s election. Mark your calendars now for her lecture on Thursday, March 20, 2008 in Schwab Auditorium. So please play the podcast below, download it, or subscribe through iTunes and enjoy!

Dr. Meena BoseDR. MEENA BOSE, ’90 Lib - Peter S. Kalikow Chair in Presidential Studies

Date: Thursday, March 20, 2008Place: Schwab AuditoriumTime: 7:00 p.m.

Meena Bose, Ph.D., was installed as Hofstra University’s first Peter S. Kalikow Chair in Presidential Studies on November 15, 2006 at the Hofstra University Club/David S. Mack Hall on the north campus.

Dr. Bose is also the head of Hofstra’s new Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency. Both the endowed chair and the center were funded by a $3.5 million gift from Hofstra trustee and alumnus Peter S. Kalikow. The gift was aimed at enhancing Hofstra’s reputation as a center for presidential studies. The University has hosted 11 conferences on the American presidency, the most recent in November 2005 on the presidency of Bill Clinton.

Dr. Bose, a nationally recognized scholar on the American presidency, had since 2001 been at West Point in the Department of Social Sciences. She was an assistant professor of political science at Hofstra from 1996-2000 and acting director of the Hofstra Honors Program from 1999-2000. She received her B.A. in foreign service and international politics from Penn State University in 1990; her M.A. in Politics from Princeton University in 1992; and her Ph.D. in Politics from Princeton in 1996.

She is the author of Shaping and Signaling Presidential Policy: The National Security Decision Making of Eisenhower and Kennedy, (Texas A&M University Press, 1998); co-editor with Mark Landis of Making the Grade: The Uses and Abuses of Presidential Ratings (Nova Science Publishers, 2003); “The Leadership Difference: Rating the Presidents;” and co-editor with Rosanna Perotti of The Foreign Policy World of George Bush (Greenwood Press, 2002) Dr. Bose is co-editor with John J. DiIulio of the upcoming Classic Ideas and Current Issues in American Government (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2007), an introductory American politics course reader to accompany James Q. Wilson and John J. DiIulio’s American Government: Institutions and Policies (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2006).

 
icon for podpress  Dr. Meena Bose: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Remembering Dr. King and continuing his work.

I was again asked to speak at the Peace Service in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Below is the text of my speech. The Collegian ran an article today about the event as well.

It is an honor and a privilege to speak to you today. Over the last week or so we have had an incredible number of excellent events commemorating the life and legacy of Dr. King. This morning I was reflecting on the fact that, in many ways, my knowledge of Dr. King is much like yours. I was born in 1968, the year in which Dr. King was slain, so for me he was always an historical figure. A man whose life and history, words and actions were to be studied yes and even emulated. But as a number of articles this week pointed out, when a person has lived a life as large and died as tragically as Dr. King it is easy, far too easy for him to become a mere figure, a cardboard cutout and caricature.

When Dr. King was killed his famous speech, where he declared “I have a dream,” was five years in the past. He had moved his energies from racial equality and defeating Jim Crow laws to fighting the US involvement in the Vietnam War and poverty. He knew, as one article notes, that “the Dream was turning dark.”1It seems ridiculous to say it this way, but the bus boycott and the voting rights were easy battles to fight. Now he was taking on the deep and entrenched suffering of hunger and war, poverty and hatred. But this is why it is important to remember Dr. King, not just on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, but sitting in the room of the Lorraine Motel, nursing a migraine and working on a sermon entitled, “Why America May Go to Hell.”

One scholar says that “she believes it’s important for Americans in 2008 to remember how disliked King was in 1968. ‘If we forget that, then it seems like the only people we can get behind must be popular,’ Harris-Lacewell said. ‘Following King meant following the unpopular road, not the popular one.’”2

At that is where we find ourselves today. Again at war, still facing poverty, racial inequality still a reality, and looking for leaders.
Last week the Forum on Black Affairs hosted a dinner the theme of which was “Understand the Vision…Fulfill the Legacy.” The performances were wonderful and the speech incredibly powerful and stirring. These men spoke with authority that I will never have. But there were also moments of doubt, comments of concern that we have barely even begun the journey that Dr. King set us upon.

I want to offer a paradoxical word of encouragement. There is no doubt that we have a long journey ahead of us before we will truly see Dr. King’s dream a reality. In fact, I will tell you right now, that we will not see it. No, and it may be that no well ever will. BUT that does not mean we stop! The reality of this world is that there are and will always be people who hate, people who cheat, people who think more of and for themselves than for other people. While our goal must always be for ultimate and complete equality, we must not and cannot let the struggles of reality weigh us down.

Dr. King was a doctor of Scripture and theology. He was a Christian minister and knew that the road would be hard and the cross heavy to bear. But he picked up that cross! He stepped his foot onto the road and he went out into the world and made a difference, a great, a transforming, and wonderful difference. None of us can do any less! And it is in each of us to make such a difference.

So many already have. We must look down the road, not to see how far we have to go, but to see how far we have already come! When Dr. King was a student the community and mix of races in our colleges and universities was unthinkable. Today not only is an African-American a strong contender to be a presidential candidate, but just this month Bobby Jindal, an Indian American, was sworn in as governor of Louisiana. Louisiana! The same state whose town Jena has become a byword for the worst in racism is still able to elect a man of color to their highest office. There is much work to do, but much has already been done and let us celebrate that as well!

And it is in each of us to do more, to make this world a much better place. In his acceptance speech of the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 Dr. King made it clear that there was just one way that this would happen, through love.
If [we are to live together in peace] man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love.

What Dr. King understood, that so many still do not comprehend, is that love, this kind of love has nothing to do with warm feelings and romanticism. It is the kind of love that causes someone to give up their life for another. It is a love that is willing to endure hardships, ridicule, and rejection. And it most certainly has nothing to do with liking people.

Perhaps one of the most famous and well-read (if weddings are anything to go by) passages in the New Testament is all about love. It is from Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians.
1Cor. 13.4   Love is patient; love is kind; love is not envious or boastful or arrogant 5 or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; 6 it does not rejoice in wrongdoing, but rejoices in the truth. 7 It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.

None of this is easy and none of it has anything to do with liking people.
Think about. “Love is patient.” That means that at the core of this statement you are having to wait for someone else, patiently. You are giving up of your time and your schedule to wait for someone else. And let’s face it, some people can take a long time to realize what we already know to be the truth. We have to be patient. It is part of loving other people.

We have to be kind, that means soft and gentle, especially when we are dealing with conflict. Everyone in the situation feels hurt and wounded and only patience and kindness will enable us to see our way through to peace.
Love always means putting the good of others before ourselves. That is why we never have a reason to boast or be arrogant and rude. Sure, some may be better off than we are, but we are always better off than many others. Love means we are not envious.

Most of all, it means we are servants to others, not that we lose ourselves in them, but we support them and rejoice when they succeed. We open ourselves up to learning from others, listening with their ears, and seeing with their eyes, and bearing their wounds. Wherever there is injustice, love insists that we fight it, even if we might get hurt. Wherever there is hunger, love insists that we feed people, even if it means we go hungry. Wherever there is a lie, love insists that the truth must be spoken.

“[Love] bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things,” says Paul. Don’t forget this Paul was a man who was himself persecuted, imprisoned, and executed for his faith. Yet in the midst of all this he declared that we must love even and especially those who are unlovely, who do not want to be loved, and who we really don’t like. They too deserve our love. Because it is only through love that we will find peace. It is only love that can provide the strength to see it through to the end. It is love that offers hope and feeds faith.

Yes there is much, so much to be done but we know the key to victory, even if we know that we will never see it in our lifetimes. In the meantime, as the rabbinic dictum states, it is not up to us to finish the work but to carry it on. And love will carry us on.

“Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never ends.”

And neither shall the memory and legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

—-
1 Vern E. Smith and Jon Meacham, “The War Over King’s Legacy.”
2 The scholar is Melissa Harris-Lacewell, professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, “Martin Luther King Jr.’s legacy oversimplified, scholars say.”

Last Call for Engl. 404!

If you are looking for an upper level English course might I suggest the following? I just met with this new faculty member, who is great. You can do an honors option, if you need it.  

Engl. 404, section 002. T, Th. 1.00 – 2.15 pm: Professor Suresh Canagarajah

Mapping Identity, Difference, and Place: 
The Politics of Language in Postcolonial Literature 
In this course, we will analyze the role English language plays in representing the identities of multilingual writers from former British colonies. We will read representative poetry, fiction, and drama from Africa, South Asia, and the Caribbean Islands to consider the challenges in using a second language to articulate difference. Special emphasis will be paid to the writings of Achebe, Soyinka, Walcott, Rushdie, and Roy. As we consider the different strategies these authors have used over time to represent themselves more effectively in English, we will also make forays into theoretical literature on the politics of English language. After studying the early debates between Achebe, Ngugi, and Okara on ways of negotiating the possible alien values informing English, we move on to theorizations of hybrid identities and literacies in the geopolitical contact zones from the work of Anzaldua, Bhabha, and Pratt among others. In addition to articles and creative works posted electronically on Angel, we will choose texts for discussion from Rotten English, edited by Dohra Ahmad (Norton, 2007). The assignments will constitute short response essays on theoretical articles, an end of term paper on creative literature, and a midterm mini-research that will involve interviewing a student from a postcolonial community to understand the strategies he/she employs to represent his/her identities in any genre of English writing. 

SHC in the Daily Collegian

My earlier post about the increase in applications and minority applicants was picked up by the Daily Collegian. The article is here, be sure to read it in full!

A Penn State Mardi Gras

Some of you may know that prior to our joining the SHC and PSU last year we had lived for 9 years in New Orleans. Mardi Gras is, of course, a major “cultural event” in NOLA. :-) The daytime events are great fun for the kids and many schools allow kids to dress up and go on mini-parades. So I was thrilled when a former Scholar, Emily Gula 2003, wrote with the following request.

 Dear Dean Brady, 

We are . . .  looking for some help to represent Penn State in our elementary school parade. My name is Emily Gula and I’ve been a proud Penn State alum since graduating from the Schreyer Honors College in 2003. For the past 5 years I have been teaching in New Orleans. I am currently teaching kindergarten at KIPP: McDonogh 15 Elementary School located in the French Quarter (http://www.mcdonogh15.org). Every year we celebrate Mardi Gras with a school parade through the Quarter. This year’s theme is “College Bound Kids.” I would love, love, love to have my class – bound for college in 2020 –  show so  me Penn State Pride. (They are already experts at the We Are Penn State cheer.) We would appreciate any donations – stickers, buttons, t-shirts, pennants, etc. Thanks in advance for your support.    Sincerely,Emily Gula and the Kindergarten Class of 2020

We need to work fast, we will need to mail the goodies to them by the end of this week, so if you have Penn State items that you would like to donate, please bring them to our office in Atherton by Friday morning. After all, We are! Penn State!

Ms. Gula's Class

Applications to date

I thought some might find a few statistics of interest from our current application pool. As of 1.7.08 we have

  •  2,325 applications
  • 34% of our applications are from out of state, an increase of 15% over last year.
  • There was a 260% (!) increase in applications from minority students. 
  • 50/50 We are almost exactly 50% women and 50% men. 

A few comments on the figures above. Regarding the dramatic increase in applications from minority students, on the one hand, as you can imagine, this means that we did not have very many applications from minority students in the past; on the other hand, having just reviewed all of those applications, I can tell you that it is a very strong pool. Our overall applications are up nearly 10% over last year (which was up 69% over the year before). No doubt the online application is helping more students find their way to the SHC and I am very glad of this! It is certain that there are students who are now enrolled in the SHC who  would not have thought to apply had we not had a clearer presence on the Admissions application.

It does mean, however, that it is far more competitive to gain selection for the Schreyer Honors College.  Because we award every incoming freshman an Academic Excellence Scholarship of $3500/year we are limited to admitting only 300 first-year students. Thus only 13% of those who have applied will enroll as Schreyer Honors Scholars. BUT we also have opportunities for admission after students have been enrolled at Penn State for at least two semesters. So I do encourage all those who love Penn State and want to come for the great education that it does have to offer but who are not admitted initially into the SHC to come, do well at Penn State (at any of the campuses) and then apply for selection into the SHC after their freshman year. 

The bottom line: There are tremendous students applying to PSU and SHC and I am looking forward to another great spring of meeting prospective students. 

What good is it to do good?

I was listening to “The Philosophy Podcast,” which is a podcast that occasionally publishes readings of great philosophers, while doing the dishes tonight. The reading was from the Discourse and Enchiridion by Epictetus. I have never read Epictetus before (but I now know that these works are very similar to, but from a slightly later period, Paul of the New Testament) but I was taken with this particular excerpt which focused upon right action, the importance of doing the right thing regardless of consequences. The quote I offer below is quite powerful as it addresses the question of what good is it to do good when the cost can be quite high, including one’s own life. 

 Priscus Helvidius also saw this, and acted conformably. For when Vespasian [the Roman Emperor from 69-79 CE] sent and commanded him not to go into the senate, he replied, “It is in your power not to allow me to be a member of the senate, but so long as I am, I must go in.” “Well, go in then,” says the emperor, “but say nothing.” “Do not ask my opinion, and I will be silent.” “But I must ask your opinion.” “And I must say what I think right.” “But if you do, I shall put you to death.” “When then did I tell you that I am immortal? You will do your part, and I will do mine: it is your part to kill; it is mine to die, but not in fear: yours to banish me; mine to depart without sorrow.”
What good then did Priscus do, who was only a single person? And what good does the purple do for the toga? Why, what else than this, that it is conspicuous in the toga as purple, and is displayed also as a fine example to all other things? But in such circumstances another would have replied to Caesar who forbade him to enter the senate, “I thank you for sparing me.” But such a man Vespasian would not even have forbidden to enter the senate, for he knew that he would either sit there like an earthen vessel, or, if he spoke, he would say what Caesar wished, and add even more.   

The slightest acts of goodness are like the purple dye, or the leaven in the bread, that works its way through the whole. A single person and a single act can affect a whole nation and civilization. 

By the way, did I mention it is an election year? Learn, pay attention, and then vote.  

“Educational Excellence, Without Ivy”

This oped was written to BusinessWeek by our Provost Rodney Erickson and signed by all the Big 10 provosts. It is replying to the earlier article “The Dangerous Wealth of the Ivy League”. It is a very good piece (the letter, the other is good as well, but problematic, as the Provost explains).

State universities react to our report on Ivy League wealth—and its perils As BusinessWeek’s Dec. 10 article “The Dangerous Wealth of the Ivy League”, demonstrated, a sizable resource differential is developing between America’s public and private research universities. But this worrisome—and growing—funding gap cannot be solved along the lines proposed in the story by Harvard University President Drew Gilpin Faust. President Faust suggests that lesser-endowed universities should back off from “ambitious” scientific research and focus instead on social science and the humanities.

As the senior academic leaders of 11 public research universities, we emphatically reject that notion. Collectively, our institutions educate more than 380,000 students, produce 1 in every 8 American PhDs, and conduct more than $4.5 billion worth of research every year.

Over the past quarter-century, however, public universities like ours have been in the grip of a funding vise: Strained state budgets have brought significant funding decreases at the same time that we are trying to serve more students and hold the line on tuition increases.

“The Dangerous Wealth of the Ivy League” reports that leaders in higher education talk about a race for survival among universities. But what’s imperiled goes beyond the public research universities themselves. The relative impoverishment of these schools threatens to upset a public-private balance that is at the core of America’s status as the world leader in higher education and academic-based research. That balance underwrites our ability to meet global competition with social, scientific, and economic leadership.

We believe that most of our colleagues at private research universities would agree that it benefits our country—and private universities—to have a strong cadre of public research institutions. Since World War II, when the country realized the need to provide global leadership, we have recognized the importance of research in higher education. That research has yielded huge benefits.If we are to continue the extraordinary process of discovery and creativity that is the hallmark of our great research universities, we must be willing to provide the support our public institutions need to sustain their educational and scientific excellence. The ultimate stakeholder is the nation. And the stakes are high.


Rodney A. Erickson, Provost, Pennsylvania State University; R. Michael Tanner,Provost, University of Illinois-Chicago; Karen Hanson, Provost, Indiana University-Bloomington; Linda Katehi, Provost, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Lola L. Lopes, Interim Provost, University of Iowa; Teresa A. Sullivan, Provost, University of Michigan; Kim Wilcox, Provost, Michigan State University; E. Thomas Sullivan, Provost, University of Minnesota; Joseph A. Alutto, Provost, Ohio State University; Victor L. Lechtenberg, Interim Provost, Purdue University; Patrick Farrell, Provost, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Happy New Year! Time to read applications.

I hope you all have had a good break. I was able to spend a lot of time with family, which was very good, in spite of Wii related injuries. :-) I have also spent a lot of time looking over applications. We have, to date, over 2400 applications! A new record, which is very gratifying, but it also makes our job very difficult. All of the applications are very strong and every one of these students will make fantastic Penn Staters (and we DO hope that all will attend PSU regardless of their admission to SHC). Unfortunately we can only select 300 incoming freshmen per year since each student is guaranteed a minimum Academic Excellence Scholarship of $3500/year.

So it is a happy yet challenging duty to make our way through these apps. For those who don’t know, the process for review of the applications is that each app goes to be read by at least two faculty members (we have over 60 working hard on their packets!) in addition to being reviewed within our own office. After we receive those reports final decisions will be made regarding selection for the SHC and any additional scholar funds. Our office also works closely with the other colleges (Liberal Arts, Engineering, etc.) in order to maximize scholarship packages wherever possible.

Notifications will go out in late February. I also want to remind everyone that if you have a quick question you can IM our Admissions staff at SHCAdmissions.

Next week students return and classes begin! (Including mine. It will be good to get back in the classroom.) So travel safe to returning students and hang in there to all our applicants!